Prevost v. Severino — Third District affirmed without written reasoning

Case
Ronilde Tumbarell Prevost, et al. v. Bernardo Severino
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; GORDO; LOBREE
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-0803
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ronilde Tumbarell Prevost and other appellants appealed from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge Mavel Ruiz presided over the underlying case.

The Third District’s opinion does not identify the nature of the dispute, the ruling challenged on appeal, the parties’ arguments, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis for the affirmance. The opinion states only: “Affirmed.”

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • Judges Logue, Gordo, and Lobree comprised the appellate panel.
  • The written per curiam opinion did not explain the basis for the court’s ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no precedential reasoning or guidance about the underlying legal issues. The opinion was designated not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top