Price v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
David W. Price v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Smith; Brownlee
Date Decided
October 20, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2659
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David W. Price appealed from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County, where Judge Shannon H. McFee presided over the proceedings identified by lower-tribunal case numbers 2022-CF-001644, 2024-CF-000194, and 2024-CF-000195.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the procedural history, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s disposition. Judges Nardella, Smith, and Brownlee concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. The opinion therefore establishes only that the challenged lower-court disposition remained in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify or resolve any specific legal issue in a reasoned analysis.
  • The participating appellate judges were Nardella, Smith, and Brownlee.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of the appeal by leaving the circuit court’s disposition undisturbed. Because the court issued a bare per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers practitioners no articulated rule or reasoning to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top