Pullen v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Allen Pullen v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); STARGEL, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); PRATT, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0992
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Allen Pullen appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for Osceola County in lower-tribunal case number 2013-CF-001014. Circuit Judge Keith A. Carsten entered the ruling under review.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). Pullen represented himself, and the Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion provided no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Stargel and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam decision without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the specific claims Pullen raised or the precise nature of the ruling under review.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no precedential analysis on the underlying issues. Any description of Pullen’s claims or the basis for affirmance would require information beyond this opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top