Pushya, LLC v. Voscopoulos — affirmed the nonfinal circuit-court order without a written opinion

Case
Pushya, LLC, Dhanish, LLC, Jyeshtha, LLC, and Christopher Voscopoulos v. Candice Voscopoulos a/k/a Candice Desrosiers, Ally Strategy Associates, LLC, Lisa Gaulin, Riemenschneider, Wattwood and DeRosier, P.A., Riemenschneider Law, P.A., Michael R. Riemenschneider, Jeffrey L. DeRosier, Freeport Tax Service, Inc., Matthew Gruberger, Gregory Voscopoulos, Joseph Reese, and Vatsu, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wallis; Harris; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1931
Topics
Nonfinal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Pushya, LLC, Dhanish, LLC, Jyeshtha, LLC, and Christopher Voscopoulos brought a nonfinal appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Circuit Judge Samuel Bookhardt III entered the order under review.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the particular nonfinal order challenged, summarize the parties’ arguments, or state the circuit court’s reasoning. Joseph Reese appeared through counsel on appeal, while the remaining appellees made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s nonfinal order. Judges Wallis, Harris, and Boatwright concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court issued no written analysis or statement of the legal grounds for affirmance. The decision therefore resolves this appeal but does not disclose which arguments the court accepted or rejected.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the challenged nonfinal order.
  • The panel issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion provides no factual or legal analysis from which a broader rule can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s nonfinal ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning and did not identify the issue presented, the opinion offers little guidance beyond the result in this particular appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top