Qu v. Florida Dept. of Health — Court dismisses petition for review of non-final agency action

Case
Liping Qu, L.M.T. v. State of Florida, Department of Health, and State of Florida, Surgeon General
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
June 22, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0177
Topics
Administrative Law, Licensed Massage Therapy, Agency Action, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Liping Qu, a licensed massage therapist (L.M.T.), filed a petition in the Florida First District Court of Appeal seeking review of non-final agency action taken by the Florida Department of Health and the Surgeon General. The proceeding was initiated as original appellate proceedings under Florida’s rules governing review of administrative agency decisions before a final order is issued.

The nature of the underlying agency action against Qu is not detailed in the opinion, but the case arose in the context of professional licensing oversight by the Department of Health, which regulates massage therapy licensure in Florida.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition in a one-word per curiam order. Judges Bilbrey, Nordby, and Treadwell all concurred in the dismissal. The court provided no written explanation for the dismissal.

The order is not yet final, as it remains subject to timely and authorized motions for rehearing or clarification under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District dismissed the petition for review of non-final agency action without explanation.
  • The dismissal does not necessarily resolve the underlying administrative proceeding against Qu, which may continue at the agency level.
  • The order becomes final only after the period for filing motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 has passed without such a motion, or upon disposition of any timely filed motion.

Why It Matters

This brief dismissal illustrates the high bar for obtaining interlocutory appellate review of non-final agency action in Florida. Courts are generally reluctant to intervene in ongoing administrative proceedings before a final agency order is issued, and practitioners seeking such review must ensure their petitions satisfy the jurisdictional and procedural requirements for the court to exercise its discretion.

For licensed health professionals facing Department of Health proceedings, this outcome underscores the importance of exhausting administrative remedies and building a complete record at the agency level before seeking appellate review, as premature petitions risk dismissal without reaching the merits.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top