R.M.E. v. State — Sixth District affirmed the judgment without explanation

Case
R.M.E. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
BROWNLEE (Ron DeSantis, 2023); KAMOUTSAS (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1740
Topics
Juvenile Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

R.M.E. appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2025-CJ-000480. Circuit Judge William D. Sites entered the judgment under review.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the charge or disposition, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no legal analysis or explanation and cited no authority. Judges Brownlee, Kamoutsas, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court gave no reasons for affirmance and did not identify the issues presented.
  • The opinion establishes no express rule of law beyond its disposition of this appeal.

Why It Matters

This is an unexplained per curiam affirmance, so the opinion offers practitioners no substantive guidance about the underlying facts or legal issues. Its immediate significance is limited to leaving the lower court’s judgment undisturbed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top