Rahall v. INXS VI — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Monier Rahall, Middletown Property Management, LLC (Florida), and Middletown Property Management, LLC (Delaware) v. INXS VI, LLC
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Kelly; Atkinson; Smith
Date Decided
October 7, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1375, 2D2025-2647 & 2D2025-2660 (consolidated)
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Monier Rahall and two Middletown Property Management entities appealed rulings involving INXS VI, LLC, from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The appellate court consolidated the three appeals.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s rulings, the parties’ arguments, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation.

Because the court issued only a per curiam affirmance, the opinion states no legal rationale and announces no express rule of law. Judges Kelly, Atkinson, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the rulings under review.
  • The decision resolves three consolidated appeals: 2D2025-1375, 2D2025-2647, and 2D2025-2660.
  • The opinion provides no facts, reasoning, or explanation of the issues presented.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s rulings in place, but its one-word disposition offers no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or governing law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top