Ramirez v. Bennett — affirmed the circuit court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Maria Ramirez v. Jonathon Bennett
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Mize; Brownlee; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2230
Topics
Civil Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Maria Ramirez appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in a case against Jonathon Bennett. Circuit Judge Patricia L. Strowbridge presided over the lower-court proceeding, numbered 2020-CA-007627.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Ramirez raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond leaving the lower court’s judgment in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • Judges Mize, Brownlee, and Kamoutsas concurred in the disposition.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Bennett’s favor by leaving the Orange County circuit court’s judgment undisturbed. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no guidance about the substantive dispute or the legal grounds supporting the result.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top