Ramirez v. State — Second District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Mauro Ramirez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Kelly; Smith
Date Decided
September 16, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2026
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mauro Ramirez appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Manatee County, where Judge Teresa K. Dees presided. Ramirez represented himself on appeal, while the State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The appellate opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, the arguments presented, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Silberman, Kelly, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, charges, or procedural arguments.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Ramirez’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written legal analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top