Raper v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Dale Raper v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Treadwell; Neff
Date Decided
September 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0754
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dale Raper appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Bay County before Judge Brantley S. Clark, Jr. The abbreviated opinion does not describe the underlying facts, claims, or ruling under review.

Raper represented himself on appeal. The State of Florida was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Amanda Afeazue Uwaibi.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision. Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. The opinion states only “AFFIRMED” and therefore establishes no express rationale beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, legal issues, or nature of the ruling under review.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor, subject to any authorized post-decision motion. Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no articulated rule or reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top