Ray v. State — affirmed the trial court without a written explanation

Case
Charles M. Ray v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; Smith; Brownlee
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1674
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Charles M. Ray, proceeding pro se, appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2008-CF-014423-A-O. Circuit Judge Amy J. Carter entered the decision under review.

The opinion does not describe Ray’s conviction, the ruling challenged on appeal, the arguments raised by the parties, or the relevant facts and procedural history.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Brownlee concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed and does not identify any broader legal holding.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or description of the appellate claims.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Ray’s appeal in the Sixth District by leaving the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the court gave no explanation, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on criminal law or appellate procedure beyond its case-specific disposition.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top