Reams v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Kirk B. Reams v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Rowe; Kelsey
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2882
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kirk B. Reams appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Jefferson County, where Judge Stephen Sebastian Everett presided.

The First District’s two-page opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, or arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or deciding any stated question of law. Judges Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Reams’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written rationale for attorneys to apply in other cases.

Because the court did not identify the issues presented or articulate a rule of law, the opinion’s significance is principally case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top