Redd — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Kevin A. Redd v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
July 28, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1438
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Misdemeanor
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kevin A. Redd appealed from the County Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-MM-002971. County Judge David E. Stamey, Jr. presided below.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charge, facts, arguments, or challenged ruling. Redd was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement addressing the merits of Redd’s appellate arguments. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Wozniak and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court offered no written explanation for its decision.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, issues presented, or legal grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Redd’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore primarily case-specific rather than precedential on any identified legal issue.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top