Reed — Fifth DCA affirmed in a Rule 3.800 appeal

Case
Victor V. Reed v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Boatwright; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3527
Topics
Criminal Law; Rule 3.800; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Victor V. Reed, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County in a matter identified by the Fifth District Court of Appeal as a Rule 3.800 appeal. Circuit Judge Jeb T. Branham presided below.

The State of Florida made no appearance in the appeal. The appellate opinion does not describe Reed’s Rule 3.800 arguments or provide further details about the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion contains no legal analysis and does not state the grounds for affirmance. Judges Eisnaugle, Boatwright, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed in a Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The opinion does not identify Reed’s arguments or the precise nature of the ruling under review.
  • Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion provides no articulated legal rationale.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Reed’s appeal by leaving the circuit court’s ruling in place. Its practical value beyond the parties is limited because the court did not discuss the facts, issues, or reasoning supporting the result.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top