Reyes Rosado — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Carlos Reyes Rosado v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Smith; Mize
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1034
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carlos Reyes Rosado appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2022-CF-011863-A-O. Circuit Judge Lisa T. Munyon presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s decision does not describe the charges, the facts of the case, the issues raised on appeal, or the trial court’s reasoning. Rosado was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. Judges Nardella, Smith, and Mize concurred.

The court issued no written analysis or explanation. The decision therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed and does not disclose the appellate court’s reasoning or resolve any identified legal question in a written opinion.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment against Rosado.
  • The court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The disposition was unanimous, with Judges Nardella, Smith, and Mize concurring.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no articulated rule of law or reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top