Reyes v. Soto Carrasquillo — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jeanette Reyes v. Wilfredo Soto Carrasquillo
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2941
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeanette Reyes, representing herself, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Mark D. Kiser presided. Wilfredo Soto Carrasquillo made no appearance in the appeal.

The appellate opinion does not identify the nature of the dispute, describe the circuit court’s ruling, or state the arguments Reyes raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and announced no rule of law. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The affirmance was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal by affirming the result below, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness as guidance in other cases. Attorneys cannot determine from the opinion which arguments were presented or why the circuit court’s ruling survived review.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top