Reyes v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Javier Reyes v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gordo; Lobree; Gooden
Date Decided
October 22, 2026
Docket No.
3D26-1701
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Javier Reyes appealed from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge Miguel Manuel de la O presided. The Third District identified the matter as an appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) and listed the lower-tribunal case number as F87-13337B.

Reyes represented himself. The State of Florida was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the relief Reyes sought.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no legal analysis or explanation for its disposition. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The three-judge panel issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify or resolve any specific legal issue in writing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore principally the result for the parties rather than the articulation of a broader legal rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top