Reynolds v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jarrell Reynolds v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Roberts, J.; Nordby, J.
Date Decided
October 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1658
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jarrell Reynolds appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Wakulla County, where Judge J. Layne Smith presided. Reynolds represented himself on appeal, while the State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal issues.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued its ruling per curiam and provided no reasoning or analysis.

Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Roberts and Nordby concurred. The decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Wakulla County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying case or the issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but its lack of factual discussion or legal analysis limits what can be drawn from it beyond the result in this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top