Rickard v. Witter — affirmed the circuit court’s judgment without a written explanation

Case
Mark W. Rickard, Esq. v. Edward Witter and Nadine Witter, et al.
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross, J.; May, J.; Ciklin, J.
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1420
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Attorney Mark W. Rickard appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge William W. Haury, Jr. presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062023CA001389AXXXCE.

Rickard represented himself on appeal. Scott M. Behren represented the appellees. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion identifies Gross, May, and Ciklin as the three-judge panel.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but announces no legal reasoning or rule for attorneys to apply in other cases. The opinion was designated not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top