Rollins v. State — Conviction or postconviction ruling affirmed without explanation

Case
Lester Rollins v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Black; Smith
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-0203
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lester Rollins appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Philip James Federico presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the specific ruling challenged, or the arguments Rollins raised.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation. Judges Khouzam, Black, and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the underlying claims.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the appellate court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top