Roseau — affirmed denial of postconviction relief

Case
Jamel M. Roseau v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Levine; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1882
Topics
Postconviction Relief; Rule 3.850; Criminal Appeals
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jamel M. Roseau, proceeding pro se, appealed an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

The challenged order arose from four criminal cases in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Scott Suskauer entered the order under review. The State was not required to appear in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying Roseau’s rule 3.850 motion.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning, discussed no claims, and announced no rule of law. Judges Levine, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of Roseau’s rule 3.850 motion remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in the State’s favor but offers no precedential analysis concerning rule 3.850 motions or the underlying criminal cases. Because the opinion contains only an affirmance, no conclusions can be drawn from it about the specific claims Roseau raised or the grounds on which relief was denied.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top