Rush v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without explanation

Case
Terence L. Rush v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Mize; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1731
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Terence L. Rush appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Orange County associated with Judge Amy J. Carter. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case number as 2012-CF-003180-A-O.

Rush represented himself on appeal. The State of Florida made no appearance. The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, Rush’s arguments, or the nature of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting solely of the disposition and provided no reasoning. Judges Stargel, Mize, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the appealed circuit-court ruling.
  • The opinion does not identify the nature of that ruling or discuss the underlying facts.
  • Because the court supplied no analysis, the opinion states no express legal rationale for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor, subject to the opinion’s notice concerning the time to seek rehearing and disposition of any rehearing motion.

Its broader significance is limited because the court did not explain its reasoning or announce a legal rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top