Sanchez v. Marin — Third District affirmed the appealed ruling without explanation

Case
Neymee Sanchez v. Linette Marin
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Logue; Miller; Gordo
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-2274
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Neymee Sanchez appealed, and Linette Marin cross-appealed, from an unidentified ruling of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. Circuit Judge Christina DiRaimondo presided below.

The appellate opinion provides no facts, legal issues, arguments, or description of the ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed in a per curiam opinion.

The court offered no reasoning and did not separately discuss the appeal or cross-appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Logue, Miller, and Gordo.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale because it consists only of “Affirmed.”

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of appellate review without a written explanation of the court’s reasoning. Because the opinion supplies no facts or legal analysis, no broader substantive holding can reliably be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top