Santiago — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Jeffery Santiago v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
NORTHCUTT (Lawton Chiles, 1997); VILLANTI (Jeb Bush, 2003); ATKINSON (Rick Scott, 2018)
Date Decided
August 14, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-0131
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeffery Santiago appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Circuit Judge Philip Federico presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, arguments raised on appeal, or facts of the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Northcutt, Villanti, and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify or resolve any legal issue in a reasoned analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Santiago’s appeal in the Second District by leaving the lower court’s judgment undisturbed. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top