Santiago v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Edgar Ismael Junior Santiago v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Brownlee; Kamoutsas; Pratt
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0223
Topics
Appellate Review, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Edgar Ismael Junior Santiago appealed from the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Judge Amy J. Carter presided. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the ruling challenged, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The appeal proceeded in the Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal under case number 6D2025-0223 and lower-tribunal number 2018-CF-001768.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. The court issued a per curiam decision consisting solely of the word “AFFIRMED.”

Because the opinion provides no reasoning, it establishes no stated rationale for the result and does not identify which issues the court considered dispositive. Judges Brownlee, Kamoutsas, and Pratt concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District left the Orange County Circuit Court’s ruling in place.
  • The court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or express rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Santiago’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written guidance about the underlying legal issues. Attorneys therefore cannot rely on the opinion for a stated analysis beyond the fact that the lower court’s ruling was affirmed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top