Schipani v. Schipani — Appellate affirmance of lower court decision

Case
Justin T. Schipani v. Donna D. Schipani
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
July 8, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0928
Topics
Appeal; Pro Se Representation; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Justin T. Schipani appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County, originally decided by Judge David Leigh Stevens. Both parties proceeded pro se without legal representation. The specific factual background and claims at issue are not detailed in the appellate order itself.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal, sitting en banc, affirmed the lower court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam order without written opinion, indicating that the panel found no reversible error warranting discussion or modification of the trial court’s judgment.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court upheld the Circuit Court’s ruling in full
  • Both parties appeared pro se throughout the proceedings
  • The order is not final pending any timely motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331

Why It Matters

This affirmance resolves the appeal and leaves the lower court’s judgment intact. Parties who believe they preserved error or have constitutional grounds for further review may pursue post-conviction relief under the applicable Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top