Schmitt — affirmed the trial court without a written explanation

Case
Thomas P. Schmitt, and Florida Personal Injury Law Team, LLC v. Florida Injury Law Firm, P.A.
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); WHITE (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
6D2023-4167
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Thomas P. Schmitt and Florida Personal Injury Law Team, LLC appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County in litigation against Florida Injury Law Firm, P.A. Circuit Judge John E. Jordan presided in the lower tribunal, case number 2018-CA-002535-O.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning, announced no legal rule, and cited no authority. Judges Nardella, White, and Brownlee concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court gave no explanation for its affirmance.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, issues presented, or legal analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of Florida Injury Law Firm, P.A., but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness as guidance in other cases. Attorneys should not infer approval of any particular rationale or legal rule from the bare affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top