Schoolcraft v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jason Ronald Schoolcraft v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Wallis; Lambert
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1186
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jason Ronald Schoolcraft appealed from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, where Judge Elizbeth Ann Blackburn presided. The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, arguments, or specific ruling under review.

Schoolcraft was represented on appeal by the public defender’s office, and the State was represented by the attorney general’s office. The appellate court resolved the case in a brief per curiam opinion.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court. Judges Makar, Wallis, and Lambert concurred.

The court provided no reasoning and did not identify the specific basis for affirmance. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, or arguments on appeal.
  • The participating panel consisted of Judges Makar, Wallis, and Lambert.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

The opinion is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top