Scott v. State — Florida First DCA affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Anthony J. Scott v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3108
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Anthony J. Scott, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John F. Simon, Jr. presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the challenged ruling, describe the underlying facts, or state the arguments Scott raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. Accordingly, the decision provides no reasoning or express holding on any disputed legal issue.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was unanimous, with Judges Bilbrey, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurring.
  • Because the court supplied no factual discussion or legal analysis, the opinion does not explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Scott’s appeal in the First District unless altered through a timely authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court affirmed without a written explanation, the disposition resolves the parties’ case but offers no articulated rule or analysis for use in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top