Searle — Florida appellate court affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Mitchell Searle v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Soud; MacIver
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3379
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mitchell Searle appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marion County in lower-court case number 2024-CF-005174-A. Circuit Judge Peter Matthew Brigham presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Makar, Soud, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion.
  • The decision does not disclose the issues presented or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment in place but offers no explanation that attorneys can use to evaluate the panel’s reasoning. Its notice also states that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top