Shahmram v. Reward Florida — Fourth District affirmed the nonfinal order without explanation

Case
Rami Shahmram v. Reward Florida, LLC
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber (Charlie Crist, 2009); LEVINE (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2046
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Nonfinal Orders; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Rami Shahmram appealed a nonfinal order entered by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Michele Towbin Singer entered the order in lower-court case number 062025CA001795AXXXCE.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ underlying dispute, the nature of the challenged order, the arguments on appeal, or the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the nonfinal order.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting solely of “Affirmed.” It provided no legal analysis or stated grounds for its ruling. Judges Gerber, Levine, and Lott concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The trial court’s nonfinal order remains in effect.
  • The appellate court offered no explanation for affirmance.
  • The opinion does not identify the substantive issue presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

This decision resolves the interlocutory appeal in Reward Florida’s favor but supplies no written reasoning for lawyers or lower courts to apply in other cases.

The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top