Sistrunk v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Gary Bernard Sistrunk, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Eisnaugle, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0976
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gary Bernard Sistrunk, Jr. appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval County in lower-court case number 2024-CF-009350-A. Circuit Judge London Mahogany Kite presided below.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not identify the charges, describe the underlying facts, state the issues raised on appeal, or set out the circuit court’s ruling in further detail.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Eisnaugle and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated legal rationale beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion provides no substantive guidance on the facts, claims, or legal questions presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top