Smith v. State — First District affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Kevin Daniel Smith v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1153
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kevin Daniel Smith appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John Miller presided. The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the procedural history beyond the appeal, or the issues Smith raised.

Smith was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The State of Florida appeared as appellee through the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or addressing any legal issue in a written analysis. Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no written reasoning for its decision.
  • The opinion does not identify the claims raised on appeal or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Smith’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no substantive guidance on the underlying legal or factual questions. Because the court issued only a per curiam affirmance, the opinion itself does not disclose why the challenged judgment was upheld.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top