Smith v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Eugene Smith v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Winokur; Treadwell
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3313
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Eugene Smith, proceeding pro se, appealed a matter from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, where David James Oberliesen was the identified circuit judge. The State of Florida appeared as appellee.

The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, identify the ruling under review, or state the legal arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its disposition consists solely of “AFFIRMED” and provides no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.

Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell concurred in the per curiam decision. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the matter under review.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no underlying facts, issues, or description of the ruling being reviewed.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Smith’s appeal in the State’s favor at the First District, subject to disposition of any authorized post-decision motion. Because the court gave no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive legal analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top