Smither v. E Care Ambulance — Trial court decision affirmed without written explanation

Case
Robbie Smither v. E Care Ambulance, Inc.
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, Edwards (Rick Scott, 2014); EDWARDS and MACIVER (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3721
Topics
Appellate procedure, Affirmed judgment
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robbie Smither appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Citrus County, which was presided over by Judge Carol A. Falvey. The lower court case was docketed as 09-2025-CA-309-A. Smither, appearing pro se, was the appellant, while E Care Ambulance, Inc. was the appellee.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. The court provided no written explanation or legal analysis in its affirmance, issuing only the order “AFFIRMED” with concurrence from Justices Jay (Chief Judge), Edwards, and MacIver.

Key Takeaways

  • This is a bare affirmance with no written opinion explaining the court’s reasoning.
  • The decision is not final pending disposition of any timely authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.
  • The appellant’s pro se status did not prevent the affirmance of the lower court decision.

Why It Matters

Bare affirmances provide no precedential guidance or legal analysis. Without a written opinion detailing the facts or legal issues, this decision establishes no new law and offers limited utility for practitioners beyond the parties involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top