Smythe v. Ruiz — affirmed the circuit court without a written opinion

Case
Laurie Smythe v. Alexandra Ruiz
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; White; Brownlee
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2235
Topics
Family Law; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Laurie Smythe appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Collier County in a domestic-relations case. Circuit Judge Elizabeth V. Krier entered the decision under review.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Wozniak, White, and Brownlee concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis. The opinion therefore establishes only that the lower court’s disposition was affirmed; it does not identify the grounds for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or legal standards applied.

Why It Matters

This is a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. It resolves the appeal in Ruiz’s favor while offering attorneys no substantive analysis to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top