Spaulding — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Edward Lydell Spaulding v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015); LONG (Ron DeSantis, 2020)
Date Decided
August 10, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2894
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Edward Lydell Spaulding, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Circuit Judge James Matthew Colaw entered the order or judgment under review.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged on appeal, Spaulding’s arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Judges Kelsey, Long, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court did not explain the factual or legal basis for affirmance.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Spaulding’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Because the opinion omits the underlying facts, issues, and rationale, its significance is limited to the disposition reflected in the appellate record.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top