Stallworth v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jermaine Antuan Stallworth v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1167
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jermaine Antuan Stallworth appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge Amy P. Brodersen presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no written analysis explaining why the judgment was affirmed. The opinion therefore offers no substantive guidance about the underlying legal or factual issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top