Stanley v. State — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Tracey Lee Stanley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); EDWARDS (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
August 4, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0196
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tracey Lee Stanley appealed from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, where Circuit Judge Joel D. Fritton presided over the underlying criminal case.

The appellate opinion does not identify Stanley’s conviction, sentence, arguments on appeal, or the facts underlying the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or deciding any stated legal issue in a written opinion. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Edwards and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness for attorneys seeking guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top