Stein v. Reynolds Ventures — Florida appeals court orders condominium mechanic’s lien canceled

Case
Kenneth R. Stein and Jill Patricia Stein v. Reynolds Ventures, Inc., d/b/a Wrightway Emergency Water Removal
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Smith (Rick Scott, 2019)
Date Decided
August 7, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2795
Topics
Mechanic’s liens; Condominiums; Mandamus; Statutory deadlines
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenneth and Jill Stein own a condominium unit in the Privateer North community in Longboat Key. Reynolds Ventures, doing business as Wrightway Emergency Water Removal, recorded a mechanic’s lien after performing work under a contract with the condominium association. The lien named all unit owners and did not specify whether the work concerned common elements, though Reynolds later said it involved common elements and multiple units.

The Steins sued to discharge the lien on their unit. After the clerk issued a section 713.21(4) summons requiring Reynolds to show cause within twenty days why its lien should be enforced or canceled, Reynolds did not bring a lien-foreclosure action. Instead, it said it was trying to resolve its payment dispute with the association and requested additional time if foreclosure were required. The circuit court denied the Steins’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District treated the Steins’ certiorari petition as a mandamus petition, granted it, and directed the circuit court to vacate and cancel the mechanic’s lien on the Steins’ property. The court held that section 713.21(4) required cancellation because Reynolds neither commenced a lien-enforcement action by the summons return date nor established sufficient cause for not doing so.

The court also held that the Steins had standing. Although Reynolds contracted with the association, the lien was recorded against individual condominium units under section 718.121, giving each affected owner the Chapter 713 rights of a property owner. Reynolds’ effort to resolve its separate contract dispute with the association did not constitute statutory cause for preserving the lien, nor could the trial court extend the statutory deadline.

Key Takeaways

  • A lienor responding to a section 713.21(4) show-cause summons must strictly comply with the statute’s deadline.
  • Trying to settle or arbitrate a related contract dispute does not substitute for filing a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action or showing good cause.
  • An individual condominium owner whose unit is encumbered by a lien may seek discharge of that lien under Chapter 713.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that Florida’s mechanic’s lien discharge procedure is mandatory, not discretionary. A lienor that does not timely enforce its lien faces cancellation even if it continues to pursue contractual payment remedies against an association or other contracting party.

For condominium projects, the ruling confirms that unit owners may invoke Chapter 713 protections when a lien is recorded against their individual parcels for association-authorized work.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top