Stone v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Frank Edwin Stone v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); Bilbrey (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1861
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Frank Edwin Stone appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Circuit Judge Dustin Stephenson presided. The opinion does not identify the charges, underlying facts, issues raised, or relief Stone sought.

Stone was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning and did not address any legal argument or factual issue. Judges Rowe, Bilbrey, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court gave no explanation for its affirmance.
  • The opinion establishes no express rule of law or analysis for application in other cases.

Why It Matters

This decision resolves Stone’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no guidance about the merits because it contains no factual discussion or legal analysis.

The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top