Strawder — Fifth District affirmed in a Rule 3.800 appeal

Case
Terrell Strawder v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Kilbane; MacIver
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3893
Topics
Criminal Law; Rule 3.800; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Terrell Strawder, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Marion County in a matter identified by the Fifth District as a “3.800 Appeal.” Circuit Judge Robert William Hodges entered the ruling under review.

The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Samuel Anthony Perrone. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion provides no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Makar, Kilbane, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the ruling under review in the Rule 3.800 appeal.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the specific nature of the circuit court’s ruling or describe Strawder’s claims.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling intact but offers no precedential analysis or guidance about Rule 3.800. Any characterization of the underlying ruling or the grounds for affirmance would go beyond the opinion’s text.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top