Studemire — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without a written explanation

Case
Gerod Lekeith Studemire v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); EDWARDS (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0857
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Gerod Lekeith Studemire appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Duval County in lower-tribunal case number 16-2018-CF-5208-A. Circuit Judge Mark J. Borello presided below.

Studemire represented himself on appeal. The opinion does not identify the challenged ruling, describe the underlying facts, or state the arguments raised by either party.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Edwards and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale addressing the facts or legal issues presented.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no explanation for the result. Because the opinion contains no factual or legal analysis, it provides no express guidance on the substantive issues that may have been raised in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top