Surrancy v. State — First District summarily affirmed the unidentified ruling on appeal

Case
Terrell M. Surrancy v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Bilbrey; Treadwell; Neff
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3341
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Terrell M. Surrancy, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Washington County, where Judge Timothy A. Register presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the ruling under review, describe the underlying facts, state the issues Surrancy raised, or recount the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

In a per curiam decision, the First District affirmed. Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurred.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or explanation for its disposition. The opinion therefore establishes only that the unidentified circuit-court ruling under review was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s unidentified ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam, with Judges Bilbrey, Treadwell, and Neff concurring.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, issues, reasoning, or precedential analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the First District unless altered through an authorized and timely post-decision motion. Because the court did not explain its reasoning or identify the ruling reviewed, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top