Szederkenyi v. Sullivan — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Marton Szederkenyi v. Lindsay Sullivan, Neil Sullivan, and Dulcy Sullivan
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwards; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-2706
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marton Szederkenyi appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Nassau County, where Judge Lester Bernard Bass presided. Lindsay Sullivan, Neil Sullivan, and Dulcy Sullivan were the appellees.

The Fifth District’s abbreviated opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued its ruling per curiam, with Judges Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurring.

Because the opinion contains only the word “AFFIRMED,” it provides no explanation of the panel’s reasoning and announces no express rule of law beyond the disposition of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The panel consisted of Judges Edwards, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of the appellees but offers no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Any assessment of the underlying issues or the basis for affirmance would require materials beyond this opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top