T.M. v. Department of Children and Families — Fifth District affirmed the circuit court without a written opinion

Case
T.M., Mother of A.C., a Child v. Department of Children and Families
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wallis; Eisnaugle; MacIver
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0919
Topics
Child Dependency, Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

T.M., the mother of A.C., appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for Hernando County in a child-dependency proceeding. Circuit Judge Stephen E. Toner, Jr. presided below.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, identify the particular order challenged, or state the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the legal issues. Judges Wallis, Eisnaugle, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion supplies no factual or legal basis for extending its disposition beyond this appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive guidance on Florida dependency law or appellate standards. Attorneys cannot determine from the opinion alone which issues were presented or why the appeal failed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top