Tangen — Fifth DCA affirms without a written opinion

Case
Erlend Tangen v. Jacqueline Denise Irwin and Techscapes, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Harris; Soud
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0031
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Erlend Tangen appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for St. Johns County in litigation involving Jacqueline Denise Irwin and Techscapes, LLC. Circuit Judge Christopher Scott Ferebee presided over the lower-court proceeding.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal. Counsel appeared for Tangen, while no appearance was entered for the appellees.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Makar, Harris, and Soud concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion supplies no substantive holding beyond affirmance and identifies no legal rule applied to the dispute.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the Fifth District unless altered through an authorized and timely post-decision motion or further review. Because the court issued no reasoning, the opinion offers no guidance on the merits of the underlying dispute and should not be read as adopting any particular rationale.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top