Tavassoli v. Newsome — Second District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment without explanation

Case
Alice D. Tavassoli and David H. Tavassoli v. Robert A. Newsome
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaRose; Morris; Labrit
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-3030
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alice D. Tavassoli and David H. Tavassoli appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Melissa M. Polo presided. Robert A. Newsome was the appellee.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued its ruling per curiam, with Judges LaRose, Morris, and Labrit concurring.

Because the opinion consists solely of an affirmance, it supplies no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement identifying the specific issues decided.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The court affirmed without a written explanation of its reasoning.
  • The opinion provides no factual or legal basis for broader conclusions about the case.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the challenged circuit court ruling intact. Its practical significance is therefore clearest for the parties themselves.

Because the court did not explain the basis for affirmance, the opinion offers no articulated rule or analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top