Therrell — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Carl Lee Therrell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Roberts, J.; Nordby, J.
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1761
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carl Lee Therrell appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County. Circuit Judge Mark E. Feagle entered the judgment under review.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or arguments of the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Roberts and Nordby concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the judgment against Therrell.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale addressing the facts or legal issues presented.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court issued only an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top