Thomas — Sixth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
State of Florida v. Tramari Xavier Thomas
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; White; Brownlee
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0218
Topics
Criminal Law; Appellate Review; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The State of Florida appealed an order or judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Orange County in a criminal case involving Tramari Xavier Thomas. Circuit Judge Michael J. Snure presided in the lower tribunal.

The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe the charge, the challenged ruling, the parties’ arguments, or the procedural events that led to the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The panel consisted of Judges Nardella, White, and Brownlee.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning and identifies no specific issue resolved beyond leaving the lower court’s ruling in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s decision.
  • The State was the appellant, and Tramari Xavier Thomas was the appellee.
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion offers no explanation of the governing law or the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision preserves the result reached by the circuit court in Thomas’s case. Its broader significance is limited because the appellate court did not provide facts, legal analysis, or an articulated rule for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top